Anonymous user
Open Source Comes to Campus/Curriculum/Career Panel: Difference between revisions
Open Source Comes to Campus/Curriculum/Career Panel (view source)
Revision as of 02:00, 7 December 2013
, 10 years ago→Formats
imported>Shauna |
imported>Shauna |
||
Line 10:
We start off by asking each person to introduce themselves, their current occupation, and their current employer and to talk very briefly about how that work relates to open source. Then, the floor is opened up to questions. Attendees can sometimes be shy about asking questions, so it may be useful to have some [[Open_Source_Comes_to_Campus/Curriculum/Career_Panel#Potential_Questions | potential questions]] at the ready.
Pros: Allows for more of a discussion or debate, if you have the right set of panelists.
Cons: Students can be shy about asking their questions in front of the whole group. Easy for them to disengage.
=== Career 'Musical Chairs' ===
Students form small groups (equal to the number of panelists) and panelists rotate between them, usually for 5-10 minutes each. Interaction is hopefully more of a conversation and less of a Q-and-A.
Pros: Allows for more intimate discussions. Students may be less shy, and get to know individual panelists better.
Cons: More work for individual panelists, who may not have the social skill to handle a small group of shy/disengaged attendees. Not plausible if you have only a small number of panelists.
=== Remote Career Panel ===
Similar to the classic career panel, but with panelists joining remotely.
Pros: Able to welcome a wider range of panelists, including people who have done an OSCTC career panel and are comfortable with it.
Cons: Less opportunity for students to bond with local mentors. Potential for technical issues. We highly recommend you test out your system (frequently a simple google hangout) ahead of time!
=== Questions in a Hat ===
We did this once when two of our local panelists stepped out unexpectedly, leaving us with two people for the panel. Everyone in the room was asked to write a question, which the two remaining panelists responded to.
Pros: When done well, there are a surprising variety of questions, and more humor than the career panel usually has.
Cons: Not actually much of a conversation. (Perhaps, in addition, mentors could write out questions for students to answer?)
== Potential Questions==
| |||