Static site hosting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Paulproteus
(Created page with '== Summary == Many of the sites created by OpenHatch are purely static files. This includes the Campus Outreach site at http://campus.openhatch.org/ and the Boston Python Worksh…')
 
imported>Paulproteus
Line 14: Line 14:
* Both are super cheap; less than $40/yr for our needs.
* Both are super cheap; less than $40/yr for our needs.
* Rackspace Cloud Files has an SLA that guarantees 99.9% uptime, but I would say the SLA has no "teeth" -- they will simply refund portions of your month's hosting costs, which to us is very little money. You can read it here: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/files/faq/
* Rackspace Cloud Files has an SLA that guarantees 99.9% uptime, but I would say the SLA has no "teeth" -- they will simply refund portions of your month's hosting costs, which to us is very little money. You can read it here: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/files/faq/
* In general, I strongly prefer to put static sites with hosts that understand how easy it is to serve static sites. NearlyFreeSpeech.NET and Rackspace Cloud Files and others have clear provisions for marking sites as static, which indicates they have a clue.


== Status ==
== Status ==